Journal article

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Medial Stabilised Total Knee Prosthesis to a Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilised Design - A Report of the Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following Total Knee Replacement

Michelle M Dowsey, Daniel Gould, Tim Spelman, Marcus G Pandy, Peter F Choong

The Journal of Arthroplasty | Elsevier BV | Published : 2020

Abstract

Background The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the performance of 3 total knee joint replacement (TKJR) designs 6 months after the surgery. Methods Patients were recruited between March 2015 and March 2018. Patients with osteoarthritis consented for TKJR were randomly allocated to a medial stabilized (MS), cruciate retaining (CR), or posterior stabilized (PS) design. Primary outcome measures were self-reported improvement in pain and function 6 months after TKJR, using the Oxford Knee Score. Secondary outcome measures were the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey, Knee Society Score 2011, Timed Up and ..

View full abstract

Grants

Awarded by National Health and Medical Research Council


Funding Acknowledgements

Associate Professor Dowsey holds an NHMRC Career Development Fellowship (APP1122526) and a University of Melbourne Dame Kate Campbell Fellowship. Professor Choong holds an NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (APP1154203). We acknowledge the contributions of the surgeons who performed the TKJRs for this study: Mr Altay Altuntas, Mr Frances Ma, Mr Anthony Dunin, Professor Peter Choong, as well as the study coordinator Dr Tony Young.